Monday, September 11, 2006

Five Years







"If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves and pray..."



Four airplanes, three buildings, and a field -
They will forever be engraved in our memories.
The sacrifice of those fallen,
the courage of those left behind.
The fear, the hate, the confusion, and the...
Prayers?

Five years since the tragedy,
Five years since the heroics.
Five years to mourn,
Five years to rebuild,
Five years to...
Forget?

"God bless America" was our cry,
Heard from every corner of our country.
Sworn Atheists and devout Believers
Together sought comfort in that phrase;
But why should He bless...
Us?

Five years have passed.
Five years -
But what has come of it?
"God bless America" -
Should not America bless God...
First?




"...and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, ..then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land."

Saturday, July 22, 2006

In His Presence

A huge auditorium. A band playing its heart out. A mosh pit. Hundreds of youth (and some brave adults) jumping, singing, and screaming at the top of their lungs.

One would think that what I just described is a scene at a rock concert. But, no, it wasn't. You see, the band was actually a worship team. The screaming "audience" was a congregation. The "mosh pit" was full of kids shouting with worship - not for the musicians, but for the One worth worshipping. They weren't rocking out to a new hit, but dancing with the joy of the Lord.

We're gonna be a dancing generation, Dancing because of Your great glory, Lord...
We're gonna be a shouting generation, Shouting because of Your great mercy, Lord...

Dancing for God. Shouting for God. Young people wearing shirts that said "I WOULD DIE TONIGHT FOR MY BELIEFS." Excitement about our faith.

And this all took place at the In His Presence worship conference at Vineyard Christian Fellowship in Anaheim.

Forget about walking on air... I'm dancin'!!

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

His Sacrifice...


...Our Gain. Just think about it: God the Father gave His Son so that we could know and love Him.

Really, the reason I'm writing anything is because I found this beautiful picture and decided to post it.

A picture is worth a thousand words, right? In essence, I think this one sums up a whole lot. Christ's sacrifice - and His kingship. Our victory through Him. "Oh victory in Jesus, my Savior forever..."

Thursday, May 04, 2006

Day of Prayer

Heavenly Father,

You have promised that "if My people, who are called by My name, will humble themselves and pray..." that You will guide and protect us. Father, we beg that You not forsake our nation, that You reawaken her to Your truth. We have become inundated with relativism and false religions, with an attitude of "anything goes." Strip that away, Lord! Reveal Yourself to the blind; open their ears to Your voice; open their heart to Your love.

May today be a day of unity, when all Christian brethren join together in one voice, with one plea: "Hosannah! Save, Lord!" Pour out Your Spirit amongst us, overwhelm the secular world with the power of Your might. Give Your children the boldness to speak out, and be confident in our faith. Cause a hunger - even a curiosity - to be born in the lost souls of our country. Indeed, of the world! Let the light and salt that Your ministers and witnesses display be unabashed and glorifying to Your name.

God, bless America!

Monday, April 24, 2006

True Love

I've just been watching an excellent movie. "Our Mutual Friend" is a BBC mini-series adaptation of Charles Dickens' novel of the same name. As is common with BBC productions (think back on Pride and Prejudice...), this has been excellent. And, as is common with any Dickens story, the plot is long and twisted, so to try to explain it in a (relatively) short post will be nigh impossible.

One of the many threads focuses upon two young people: John, an apparently destitute secretary, and Bella, the proud, mercenary young lady that he loves. Early in their relationship he proposes, and she turns him down flat. He does not press his suit, but still remains attentive to her, showing her his friendship and trustworthiness. They become friends; some of her airs disappear. Through a series of events, some unrelated to him directly, she begins to see his true worth as an honorable man, and becomes disillusioned regarding the appeal of wealth. The real test comes when John's employer - Bella's guardian - becomes aware of the previously refused proposal. He sacks John, accusing him of gold-digging; John insists that there was no ulterior motive, save his growing love for Bella. Bella, having truly altered her attitudes towards wealth and happiness, defends John, and promptly quits her guardian's house, returning to her own impoverished family. When he learns of her brave choice, John proposes again, and is this time accepted by a wiser Bella.

This may seem candy-coated to some, but when I was watching this movie, an interesting thought struck me. There is no "chemistry" between these two. How could that be? All the modern books and movies tell us - persistently - that love starts with an attraction. Generally, a physical attraction. And yet, I am utterly convinced that they are truly in love. It wasn't the secretive glances, or the passionate kisses - there was no kissing until the wedding. It was what they did for each other.

John never crossed the bounds of decency. He kept a polite distance, and rarely engaged her in conversation unless she initiated it. He was respectful, and gentle to her when she first refused him. He did not hold a grudge, or take an attitude of "I'll show her." Nor, did he ever bring up the subject to her, unless she brooked the topic. He was a friend to her, but did not force his friendship upon her. He honored Bella's request to not inform her guardian of his refused offer, because he knew it would embarrass her. When turned from the house, he did not demand that she make a choice between her guardian and prospective fortune, and him; despite the fact that he could see her deepening regard.

Bella, when she began to appreciate his friendship, started to see the trappings of fortune with different eyes. She regretted her attitudes toward him, and apologized. She grew to trust him and respect him for who he was, not what he was. The good sides of her nature, which had been hitherto stifled, blossomed: generosity, friendship, sensitivity. Her ultimate sacrifice came after John's dismissal. She did not leave to follow him; she left because she saw how money had tainted the guardian she had so loved, causing him to suspect everyone close to him of greediness. Because of this attitude, he had wrongly accused John of mercenary intentions towards Bella, and she would not stand for it.

It is my firm opinion that the classic writers - Dickens, Austen, Bronte - understood what love really is. It may begin by a superficial attraction, but it can only last if both parties are willing to work for the good of the other. Lizzie and Darcy eventually sacrificed their opinions; Jane and Mr. Rochester found true happiness after they had both given up something that was precious; David Copperfield won Agnes once he had matured and she had endured years of waiting. The attraction was the first step in a love based on something solid, something that would last much longer than that first "spark."

"Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one's life for his friends." (John 15:13) Christ's words can be taken many ways, whether to mean literal self-sacrifice (as He performed Himself), or a laying down of one's own "life" - interests, pride, faults, desires - for the sake of another. I have come to the conclusion that true love, in part, is the lover's willingness to set himself aside for the sake of the beloved. This operates in two ways: first, the lover lets go of his vices and unnecessary caprices so as to please the beloved. Secondly, he helps his beloved to do the same - in tenderness and kindness and patience. The benefits are obvious: both people end up smoothing out each other's rough edges, making them better people in general: "As iron sharpens iron, so a man sharpens the countenance of his friend." (Proverbs 27:17)

Which brings me to the ultimate question: If Christ is our Bridegroom, shall we not do the same for Him as we are doing for our earthly loves? Shall we not aim at perfection, so as to make us as desirable to Him as possible? Of course we cannot do so on our own, which is why we must rely on His ever-ready aid: "Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her; that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish." (Ephesians 5:25-27)

And so, I pose two questions:
1) Are you loving your beloved?
2) Are you loving your Beloved?

Rather though-provoking, aren't they?

~Chelsea

Monday, April 03, 2006

God of Wonders

This is another paper that I composed for my Great Books class. Frankly, I had a lot of fun writing this one. It was like having my eyes opened to this world for the first time.

Happy Reading!
~Chelsea

------------------------------------------

God of Wonders
Chelsea Nygaard
GBT III, 3rd Paper
Due March 24, 2006

“The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep…Then God said, ‘Let there be light’…”[1] With that single command came the birth of everything physical and natural: man, beast, and the elements were brought forth from the Voice and Hands of the Omnipotent. From the dawn of time, God has been closely associated with His creation. He is called the Father of all, the Creator of the world, the Author of our lives. Through an even closer association, we say that He is our Rock and our Light. He broods over His children like a mother bird. Jesus Christ is the Spring of Life and the Holy Spirit has been likened to a rushing wind. Why all these metaphors? Why do we draw so many connections between the Creator and the created? Many have endeavored to describe God in physical terms to make Him more understandable to our minds – but is this the only reason? We constantly hear our Lord being given the characteristics of objects: “He is strong like a rock; He shines like the sun.” What if it were turned around? “A rock is strong like God; the sun is bright like Him.” This presents an entirely new way to look at the earth and its God – and the man who presented it was Saint Thomas Aquinas.

In his work The Summa Theologica, Aquinas takes up a question regarding “whether any name can be applied to God substantially.”[2] Within his answer, he makes a declaration: “God prepossesses in Himself all the perfections of creatures…”[3] Taken at first glance, this may not seem to be an extraordinary statement. He quotes Augustine as saying “‘Because He is good, we are,”[4] therefore, because God is the Originator of everything, all the goodness and “perfection” exhibited by nature was His to begin with. However, if examined more closely, it becomes clear that what Aquinas is saying is much more complex.

Every positive quality that exists in a natural object or animal existed in God first. As stated earlier, we often say that “God is strong like a rock,” but it could be that we have it backwards. First, why do we use this image? A boulder is sturdy, immovable, firm, and can be either foundational or crushing. The connection begins to clarify: God is steady and unwavering, never changing, while Christ is connected with the stone that either supports a building or acts as a stumbling block.[5] Therefore, we are justified in using this metaphor. On the other hand, would it not be closer to reverse the order of the words? Where did these characteristics originate – in the stone or in its Mason? Only One of the two was around before the foundations of the earth were laid. “Hence every creature represents Him, and is like Him so far as it possesses some perfection…”[6] God does not have the attributes of that boulder; that boulder has the attributes of God. He projected a few facets of His personality – steadfastness, strength, and permanence - onto that piece of His creation, so that His people might never forget that He is Who He is.

In Romans, Paul states quite clearly, “For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead…”[7] How might God’s attributes reveal themselves in the natural world? It could be accomplished through several methods, some more comprehensive than others. A modern scientist could go into incredible detail while searching for parallels; but there may be a simpler method. To the ancients, all matter was composed of only four elements: Wind, Earth, Fire, and Water. Describing each and their characteristics should shed light onto how they can illustrate their Designer.

When God made Adam, He breathed air – life – into his nostrils. In its most general form, “Wind” can include more than merely the breezes and gales that sweep the land. Air and the atmosphere, and breath itself, can all fall into the same category. Without air, without something to breathe, all life would perish. Wind in the sails of a ship powers it forward, towards an anticipated destination. The layers of air and gasses that envelop the planet protect it from deadly light and unfriendly space. Most amazing of all, it is invisible and has no form, so we cannot detect it through our senses.

“Earth” is a misleadingly simple word. When taken in its entirety, it encompasses soil, rock, and gem. It may be the dirt that nourishes an orchard; it may be what that house is built with. Boulders can either support immense weight or crush a man to death. The gem, particularly the diamond, is one of the most treasured items in the world. Radiance and permanence combined.

Without light, we could not see anything surrounding us. Illumination emanates from the sun, candles, light bulbs, and bonfires. Fire not only provides light, it also warms the cold traveler on a winter’s night. In a metalworker’s forge, it burns impurities out of the iron or gold, so as to produce a perfect item. It can be destructive, charring homes and taking lives. At the same time, in a controlled setting, a forest fire can clear the way for new and healthier growth to appear.

Water is a contradictory element. It can cool or scald, depending on its temperature. Sprinklers and drinking fountains provide essential sustenance, while a tidal wave can level an entire coastline. Snow, clouds, rain, ice, steam, or dew: it has many forms, and is not restricted to any one of them. It cleans like no other agent, having the ability to make the dirtiest clothing or person spotless.

A very clear portrait of our Sovereign begins to emerge through these components of nature. Nevertheless, an essential factor has not been addressed. Father, Son, and Holy Ghost – He is Three in One. Is this reflected anywhere in Creation? Yes, it is. “Then God said ‘Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness…’”[8] There has been much debate as to whether or not man has three parts to his personality. In defense of this argument is the fact that the New Testament employs three words to signify life: spiritual life, mental life or the soul, and physical life.[9] If an opinion in favor of this view is to be accepted, then the human person is made with a spirit, soul, and body. Aside from literally making humans tri-dimensional beings, God infuses them with creativity, strength (whether physical or mental), reason, and wisdom. Once again, this illustrates His powers in a diminished way: He, the Creator of all, possesses the greatest Creative Mind in existence; His Power knows no equal; His Thoughts and Speech are unparalleled for their Infallibility; He knows all things and understands all things with perfect Comprehension. He truly did make man in His image.

By investigating the evidence, it has been made apparent that our Father infused His character into the entire world around us. So much so, that it seems complete. His gentleness and power, His simplicity and complexity, His splendor and invisibility: all sides of Him are made clear. Would it not be accurate to say that by studying nature we come to know Him? When viewed in this light, the Scriptures seem almost superfluous. Let the physical world be our Bible, our guide to God’s Personality. If He is in nature, what else do we need?

On the other hand, there was the time when Elijah stayed on Mount Horeb, and the Lord came to speak with him. God sent a windstorm, an earthquake, and a fire, but He was not in any of those. It was only after Elijah heard a “still small voice” that he responded and went to converse with God.[10] Why? Later in his article, Aquinas explains that “creatures are the representations of God, although in an imperfect manner…”[11] . If you take a piece of metal, and hold it so the sun strikes it, the metal shines. But its brightness is trifling when compared to what illuminates it. So is it with this world compared to God. We and the nature around us reflect Him, yet His glory exponentially surpasses all earthly radiance.

In the Garden of Eden, when the world was “very good,” even then it was not a sufficient representation of God. He did not rely on the trees or animals or gemstones to explain Himself to mankind. He spoke with Adam and Eve directly and spent time with them; He knew them and they knew Him personally. The significance of this lies in the fact that God does not inhabit His creation. He uses it for His purposes, but He does not communicate directly with His children through it. Instead, He speaks to us in person, primarily through His Word: “Your Word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.”[12] If nature was all that was needed, why then did the Son of Man – the Incarnate Word – come to the earth?

As amazing as the physical universe is, it is nothing compared to the One who designed it. As Aquinas wrote, creation receives and projects His Character “not in its full degree, but in a measure that falls short…”[13] The only way that we can know Him – not just know about Him – is through personal relationship. Glorious though it is, creation cannot express His Love; only through words and songs and conversation can we understand His heart for us. Nature express What He is, while only through His Word can He tell us Who He is.

“For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part, but then I shall know just as I also am known.”[14] One day, we shall see why God is more beautiful than diamonds, why He satisfies thirst more completely than any spring, and why the fire of His Love is more intense than any physical flame. One day, we shall meet this God of Wonders, and understand Him: He who is the One Who “prepossesses in Himself all the perfections of creatures, being Himself simply and universally perfect.” [15]


[1] Genesis 1:2-3. The Holy Bible, New King James Version
[2] St. Thomas Aquinas, The Summa Theologica, First Part, Question 13, Article 2
[3] Ibid. “I answer that”, 4th paragraph
[4] Ibid. “I answer that”, 4th paragraph
[5] I Peter 2:7,8
[6] Summa, Pt 1, Q13, A2, “I answer that”, 4th paragraph (Italics added)
[7] Romans 1:20
[8] Genesis 1:26
[9] Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Greek entries. #2222: zoe or #4151 pneuma (spirit); #5590: psuche (soul); #979 bios (body)
[10] “And behold, the Lord passed by, and  a great and strong wind tore into the mountains and broke the rocks in pieces before the Lord, but the Lord was not in the wind; and after the wind an earthquake, but the Lord was not in the earthquake;  and after the earthquake a fire, but the Lord was not in the fire; and after the fire a still small voice. So it was, when Elijah heard it, that he wrapped his face in his mantle and went out and stood in the entrance of the cave.” (1 Kings 19:11-13)
[11] Summa, Pt 1, Q13, A2, “Reply to Objection 2”, 1st paragraph (Italics added)
[12] Ps 119:105
[13] Summa, Pt 1, Q13, A5, “I answer that”, 1st paragraph
[14] I Corinthians 13:12
[15] Summa, Pt 1, Q13, A2, “I answer that”, 4th paragraph

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

GAPDay

No, I'm not talking about the store. This stands for "Global AIDS Prevention Day", and the idea was originated by a pastor from Uganda, Martin Ssempa (yes, that's with two S's).

How would someone honor GAPDay? The scheme is just getting off the ground, but it will resemble something like this: Throughout the month of October, people - particularly college students - will wear red-and-black ribbons (AIDS awareness colors), and try to bring the AIDS crisis to the awareness of as many people as possible.

There is a major difference between this rally and all the others however. Note the word "Prevention." How would we help prevent AIDS? No, not by administering drugs or condoms. Advocate ABSTINENCE. Yep, that's it! "Excuse me; in case you don't know, this month is Global AIDS Prevention month. Would you be interested in participating? Yes? Great - here's what you would do. Would you join me and thousands (maybe millions) of other [unmarried] young people in participating in a month of sexual abstinence?" You know why? Because abstinence WORKS!!! Fancy that.

Then, on the last day, we'll hold rallies and marches...Pastor Ssempa said it the best:

We (Christians and abstinence-promoters) suffer from an abstinence stigma. It's time to shake off that stigma. What would you call the opposite of Abstinence Stigma? Abstinence Pride!

Couldn't you just see this fly in the face of Gay-pride celebrations? I'm not gloating, or rejoicing over the opportunity to "get back" at anyone...it's just so exciting to see someone shouting out a rallying cry.

So, keep the month of October in mind. GAPDay. Abstinence Pride. "True Love Waits."

Oh, by the way. Uganda is the only country in which the AIDS percentage has actually dropped. From 30% in the 1980s to 6.5% a couple years ago. Why the change? Uganda is the only country to take the idea of abstinence seriously.

Just a little bee to stick in your bonnet...

It's time to reclaim our generation for purity!

~Chelsea

Turning the heat on

I don't have the time to write about all that I have on my mind. I just read an article about an Afghani man who has been "found out." Yes, he has committed the most heinous of crimes: he became a Christian.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060322/ap_on_re_as/afghan_christian_convert

And, if the trial goes the way that most trials like this go, he will be executed for it. So much for human rights. But, there is hope! He can be declared mentally unfit to undergo a trial, and the case may be dropped. Of course - he must be insane, because no Muslim in his right mind could possibly forsake the "true religion."

Oy. Things are certainly shaking up down here, aren't they? Wars, rumours of wars, natural disasters, political corruptions, and a spike in persecution.

Come, Lord, come quickly!

~Chelsea

Saturday, January 07, 2006

Strength from the Pain

My Heavenly Father,

You know my life, inside and out, from beginning to end.
You see what my purpose will be, and what my failings are now.
You understand my joys and griefs.
Thank You for Your comforting presence in this time of heartache.

My pain was sharp; my sorrow overwhelmed me.
The enemy of my soul came, tempting me to despair and to blame.
I did not know how I was going to survive this separation.
But You whispered to me in my agony.

When I fell to my knees, sobbing, I cried out to You.
I called for light in my darkness.
I begged for forgiveness - for placing another above You.
You, in Your everlasting Love, comforted me.
You let me know that Your desire for me will never fade; Your affection is eternal.
You held me in Your arms, and told me I was Yours.

Thank You, My God, for opening my eyes to You again.
My pain remains, but You transfigure it into a yearning for Your Will.
Whatever my future is, You know.
You hold my heart in Your hands.
I trust my life to You, once again.

I love You!

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

Hail!

Light of the Stable

By Elizabeth & Steve Rhymer (Performed by Selah)

Hail, hail to the newborn King,
Let our voices sing Him our praises!
Hail, hail, to the guiding Light,
That brought us tonight to our Savior!

Alle-Alleluia!
Alle-Alleluia!
Alle-Alleluia!
Alle-Alleluia!

Come, now, there it shines so bright
To the knowing light of the stable
Kneel close to the Child so dear!
Cast aside your fear and be thankful!

Hail, hail to the newborn King,
Let our voices sing Him our praises!
Hail, hail, to the guiding Light,
That brought us tonight to our Savior!

Alle-Alleluia!
Alle-Alleluia!
Alle-Alleluia!
Alle-Alleluia!

Hail, hail to the newborn King,
Let our voices sing Him our praises!
Hail, hail, to the guiding Light,
That brought us tonight to our Savior!

Alle-Alleluia!
Alle-Alleluia!
Alle-Alleluia!
Alle-Alleluia!

Meddling

Christmas was wonderful this year. We spent it up in Oakland, with my Mom's family; it was cold and raining (not quite a "White" Christmas, but it was serviceable). On Christmas Eve, after our traditional waffle dinner and present-opening (we open stockings Christmas Day), we packed into Aunt and Uncle's car and headed to their church for a Candlelight carol service.

Something must be stated first: My Aunt and Uncle are Unitarian-Universalists (yes, that's the name of the denomination). This particular church is very welcoming to everyone - that's a good thing. But the main problem is the fact that their philosophy is one of "all roads lead to Rome." In otherwords, be you Buddhist, Satanist, Protestant, New-age, or whatever, you're just fine, and you're going to heaven anyway (or is it Nirvana?)

Unfortunately, this infiltrated the Carols we sang. Oh, they were traditional, all right: Angels we have heard on high, Silent Night, Away in a Manger, Joy to the World, etc. HOWEVER, more than once, I noticed that the lyrics had been altered. So, instead of "Good Christian men, rejoice!" it was "Good people, all rejoice!" I suppose that isn't all that objectional, but when they messed with the lyrics so as to diminish the divinity of Christ - now that got to me. Excuse me, but I have a problem with saying: "Joy to the world, the Lord is come, let love the people bring! Let every heart prepare IT room..." That made me twitch. Or "Silent Night, holy night, CHILD of God..." Whenever there was the word "King" or "Son" or "Savior", it was almost always replaced with a more "gender-friendly", non-spiritually-threatening alternative. Now, I did notice that they left "Hark! the Herald Angels Sing" intact. As with "Away in a Manger" (of course, we only sang the first verse of that one).

It was a beautiful service. The candles gave an enchanting glow to the room. And I was relieved that they stuck with real carols, rather than inserting hymns to the celtic sun god or something. But that may have at least been more honest. In slightly changing the words to these beautiful songs, they strip them of their power. Throughout the service, the ministers told the Christmas story...but left out the part about Christ being the only Son of God who came, not just as a child to deliver messages of hope and peace and love, but as a King calling His people to Salvation from eternal darkness. Without that, what is the point of this celebration? One may as well be singing praises to Ghandi. Take away the Reason for His coming, and you strip the day of its Reason for celebrating.